新闻发布中心

Icon 交易/租借球员: Palmeiras & Firer's
-- 85 季 1 天
球队提出了交易报价
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 85 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 85 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 85 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 85 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
接受交易报价 -- 85 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
交易被公平竞争委员会撤销 -- 85 季 4 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
公平竞赛委员会决定交易不公平，并给予球队警告。 -- 85 季 4 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 11<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
5 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- João Junior Huck (Predicted peak RT 379) - disbalance from level of other players involved in trade<br />
 -- 85 季 4 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
This trade reduced the other team´s payroll the max it could (his desire) and landed him two starters, one of them a rare 200ish Brazilian player + a young player with potential 7. I disagree with this call. -- 85 季 5 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
Player was cut from the original team because it went bankrupcy, with our trade would have avoided. -- 85 季 7 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0