Pressekonference
Byttehandel/Udlåning af spillere:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
84 S
21 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
84 S
21 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted
--
84 S
21 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
I needed a Point Guard for the near future and traded my most expensive player at the time. I was bankrupt and had already lost my top 3 players, so I had to make a good trade as soon as possible. Whoever tried to report my this trade is probably just mad I didn’t give them Cely for nothing. This was the only decent trade I could find. A player that has forward size and point guard ball handling was a no brainer for me, so long as he was already lended out and wouldn’t cost me more than 2000 a week this season. I had to trade for a player that could contribute to my team immediately next season, but also has the ability to improve the next few seasons. Kalnietis also fits the game plan of my team because I have a team that will shoot a majority of 3s, so I needed high IQ guys that could shoot. Pairing Kalnietis with my recent draft pick and the improvement of my other high potential players will be more than worth losing one big man that I was going to lose for nothing anyway. Also, Cely is a Center in a Power Forward body. He doesn’t have the size or defensive potential to contribute long term on a team full of shooters. 6’9 finishers need a pick and roll offense and a dominant defensive big man to pair with. I’m a basketball player in real life, so I understand overall is not the only thing that matters in basketball. The individual skills each player has are the most important thing to look at when predicting a players’ impact. If I didn’t go bankrupt, I’d still have 3 players above 200 and therefore would have kept Cely. Sadly, I went bankrupt and lost almost all of my talent. I was lucky to pull this trade off and not lose Cely for nothing. Mind you, had I not done this trade, I’d have been left with only 2 players under contract for next season in Johnson and Makie. I was lucky to be able to reaquire Spettell in the free market and wouldn’t have been able to if I traded for a player that wasn’t lent out. I still have a negative balance and was positive for only the day I placed bids on Spettell and the big man. Had I not gotten either of them, I would have had to bring up my 16 and over prospects from my basketball school. That would kill their rate of growth. Lastly, the trade restrictions were very strenuous so I literally could only make specific trades regardless. Whoever reported this trade is a hater. I had a player harassing me while I was bankrupt, attempting to trade for all my good players before I lost them, yet he was offering terrible trades that would greatly hurt my team and financial situation. I will be providing his team name and username here as well.
--
84 S
35 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+1
Manager: trw542003
The Vietnam Veterans team manager was constantly harassing me and offering me terrible trade offers while I was in possession of my 3 high tier players. -- 84 S 35 Dag
The Vietnam Veterans team manager was constantly harassing me and offering me terrible trade offers while I was in possession of my 3 high tier players. -- 84 S 35 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
He tried to make stupid trade offers to me as well. If he has the nerve to report a trade, he shouldn’t even be allowed on the game. Every trade he offered me has been unfair. This is hilarious to me. You probably didn’t even need to give such a pristine explanation lol. I don’t know how the trade could be considered unfair anyway. Cely hasn’t even played anywhere near as good for me as for you anyway.
--
84 S
35 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
84 S
35 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
-- 84 S 35 Dag
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
-- 84 S 35 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
Sorry, wasn't me fellows.
--
84 S
36 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+2
This was trash, but I’ll survive the hate
--
84 S
53 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0