Pressekonference

Icon Spiller: Malakai Whowood (RT: 223)
-- 101 S 57 Dag
Spilleren har taget imod den kontrakt din klub gav
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0
22222Eu - piesplanos
20000Eu - Mavericks
19598Eu - qwazy (Offer accepted)
15875Eu - Mavericks
9999Eu - ale92c
8888Eu - janggaming
8500Eu - jmv05
8500Eu - Team_1
7500Eu - asapeagle
6427Eu - ch2003
5873Eu - Mavericks
Well noted. -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0
you got it cheaper whats the problem? -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+2
No problem at all..if somebody target your player what are you doing? -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0
same story again... it is okay to overpay 25k when you get player from someone but you got problem to pay 20k now. all users need players, only one chance to get from restricted market is to overpaid cuz everone extending players. did these guys offer to all all your players? -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+3
I got him from someone who left the game and I am active manager - that's the difference. Anyway, I don't have more comments here, just noted. -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+1
funny -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0
Mine was the biggest offer because this team bidded for many of my players in the past, and I told this team I would do this if this situation happened again... So that's it

And I will apply the same logic for any other team, I have nothing against this one or any other particular one -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+3
Is there a public confession by the Spaniard that he is specifically harming the market? qwazy, I would suggest you approach the FPC with this proof and it shouldn't be difficult for the FPC to punish piesplanos. -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+11
Harming the market when I offered for a player less than what that player is earning this season? Good logic xD -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+1
It is not the amount of money that is important here, but the motive. -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+2
Then it is not harming the market...

And if it is about harming a team, I could have bid for any other worse player/coach, but I did it for one that is really good that would strengthen my team... And not only now but previous seasons, and in many different occasions
Isn't that the purpose of the market?

I think everyone is mature enough here to know what is going on, not only with this specific case but in the market in general... -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0
Now you can say whatever you want. You slipped up with the confession. ("Mine was the biggest offer because this team bidded for many of my players in the past"). I hope the FPC will punish you. Good luck. -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+7
I thought Darys was joking...but seems true. People surprise me everyday -- 101 S 57 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0
Simply put:

The system’s poor design allows slightly higher single-season contracts to outbid multi-year deals in the market, leading to a disruption in price equilibrium.

Because of this flawed design, players must rely on a sort of bidding consensus to establish a more balanced market order.

This consensus is an unwritten rule—once someone disregards it, others will naturally treat you the same way.

Conclusion: The real market disruptor is the system’s flawed contract valuation. All subsequent interactions are merely the market’s self-correction stemming from this issue. -- 101 S 60 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+4
My solution is to terminate restricted market and allow everyone to extend their players contracts and if they don't the players would go to the market. There's already teams in wl1 that signs most of their players for the minimum wage or very close to it in the restricted market because they 7/7 image, and other players assume they have no chance to sign a player from such big teams and don't bid. So this would also help lower league teams to keep their own players. -- 101 S 60 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0
Yi448 if you want to terminate restricted market, first aff all, early extensions should be fixed. Because right now is better to let your player go into the restricted market, because there you can extend your player in lower prices than using early extensions.... -- 101 S 60 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+1
For example my coach, with early extension they offered me to extend his contract for 15k wage, in the restricted market i managed to extend it for just over 4k -- 101 S 60 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+1
I agree. I would suggest aplying lower than average salaries for extensions for example average salary for these type of players -50%. -- 101 S 60 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0
Sidiav. visiskai sutinku. turetu buti atvirksciai. tavo komandos zaidejai turetu sutikti isanksto pratesti kontrakta uz mazesne suma,nes jau yra toje komandoje ir jiems gerai likti ten. bet pratesimo suma taaaiipppp toli nuo realios. praso 10.000 o i rinka eina uz 6-7. kas toli toli prasilenkia lyginant ju gabumus ir kaina. sita jau senai matau ir tai taip uzknisa.... isankstinio pratesimo sumos lyg is kosmoso paimtos. nesakykit kad neteisus ;) -- 101 S 60 Dag
-- (Oversæt) (Oversæt EN)
+0