記者會

Icon 交易/出借球員: Reapers & Utenos gre
-- 84 賽季 8 天
球隊提出交易請求
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 84 賽季 8 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 84 賽季 8 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員: Jin Suan
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 84 賽季 8 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 84 賽季 8 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受 -- 84 賽季 8 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
I got great 10 potential younger player. And I gave two pf/c and combo with 12 exp and good skills. One of them is longterm player. -- 84 賽季 9 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已被公平遊戲委員會撤銷 -- 84 賽季 9 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。 -- 84 賽季 9 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 7<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
 -- 84 賽季 9 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Honestly I don't even understand which team benefied from this trade so much that it had to get a revert decision. -- 84 賽季 9 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+3
You must think Rasiukas is the second coming of Jesus, no other explanation. Laughable, really. -- 84 賽季 9 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+3
I get it. Mario is from UGD clan :D -- 84 賽季 10 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0