記者會

Icon 交易/出借球員: Answer & Cai Zara
-- 103 賽季 2 天
球隊提出交易請求
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員: E Long
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 103 賽季 2 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員: Jacobo Galaz
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 103 賽季 2 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受 -- 103 賽季 2 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易，但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。 -- 103 賽季 3 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1
- volunteers voted "Fair": 4

These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)

 -- 103 賽季 3 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
??? -- 103 賽季 3 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Very confused why there is even 1 vote to revert.. nothing wrong with this trade at all. Glad the committee agrees. Keep up the good work <3 -- 103 賽季 4 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+6
I dont understand why this is fair, because Answer here gets a useless player for his team. 7 potential players do not reach to play in wl1 and are used only for moving players around between teams from China -- 103 賽季 4 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4
You don't need to understand. If it's allowed to exchange 7pot for anything, then use it instead of asking pointless questions. -- 103 賽季 5 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4