Preses konference

team_news_1
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Spēlētājs: Matīss Buldozers
Spēlētājs mainījis komandu maiņas darījumā (Samagotia) -- 59 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Spēlētājs: Sha Zuan
Spēlētājs mainījis komandu maiņas darījumā (Conte di Montecristo) -- 59 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Glitch in game allows players to be traded from one team and then then back to the original team? Interesting. -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
On the same day -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
My mistake, phone and little screen, so I read the team name wrong. -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
GM, please start your show -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
OMG，Very challenging trade -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
I think it is fine, Conte gets salary reduction which with his team salary he probably needs, and the other team gets a good center. -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
looking at this, you can see the reason for the trade.. no need for GM to start a show -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
these trades is just showing how big of the hole are those 3 weeks.they made it the release clause way bigger,but did not change release period despite we asked that for years now,majority of community asking that! -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Where do you find the majority, CP? :D If you need to save, sack the player for his price instead of trading for one with cheaper compensation, no probs there. -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+1
With 13 people on the roster, I'd say WL1 needs sponsor funds cut. The new price to cut players though is stupidly too expensive for teams under WL1. -- 59 S 34 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0