記者會

VAL
Icon 交易/租借球員: VAL & IGNALINA
-- 81 賽季 30 天
球隊提出交易請求
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 81 賽季 30 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 81 賽季 30 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 81 賽季 30 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受 -- 81 賽季 30 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
I proposed the trade looking for a solution to deficiencies in my team, lack of a backup point guard and more physicality and defence on the perimeter. The player Vaicekonis is a quality offensive player for WL5 and there are his stats over the past seasons. He is also a player who has already made the leap in quality and is possibly in his prime POT 4 RT 182.
The players I receive have higher POT but come from a lower division and not brilliant stats but well trained and with a view to the next two seasons can contribute a lot to my goal of promotion to WL4. -- 81 賽季 30 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+2
And although it's not my problem but I think Vaicekonis in WL6 can be a difference maker and help the other team with whom he trades. Therefore I consider it beneficial for both -- 81 賽季 30 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+2
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易，但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。 -- 81 賽季 31 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 1<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
 -- 81 賽季 31 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0