球员信息

此页面包含有关游戏虚拟角色的信息。如果出现真实人名(名字,姓氏,或者其他信息),均属巧合。
x1
x1
x3
x1
Oliver Chojnacki



- 状态:
- 状态上佳
- 年龄:
- 25 岁
- 身高:
- 204 cm. (6' 8'' )
- 位置:
- SF (SG)
- 能力 (RT):
- 277
- 预估巅峰RT:
- 317
- 潜力:
- 6
- 首支效力球队:
- IŠEINU ATOSTOGŲ


技能
健康
运动技能:
投篮:
防守:
进攻:
合同信息
期限 | 4 季 |
薪水 | 11 326 Eu |
意见 | 中等 |
Market information
最低薪水要求 | 16 161 Eu |

+0

+0

+0
显示隐藏的回复: 6


How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 季 25 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 季 25 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0

Salary drop. Trade is not useful. Such potential youth will never play in wl1
--
103 季
3 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+2

With all due respect, who are You to judge whether or not these youngsters will ever be eligable for WL1 level? Do You know information about their skills or inners?:)
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 季 3 天
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 季 3 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+8

+0

+0