交易信息

接受

信息
谈判起始 2016-11-19- 22:23
谈判结束 2016-11-20- 14:28
限制级别 10
logo
Unknown Unknown
薪水: 12194 Eu
合同: 2 季 年龄: 30 岁
RT: 257 身高: 213 cm.
潜力: 10
Unknown Unknown
薪水: 10262 Eu
合同: 3 季 年龄: 27 岁
RT: 229 身高: 196 cm.
潜力: 10
logo
Lyssandros Konstantineas
薪水: 25099 Eu
合同: 5 季 年龄: 22 岁
RT: 231 身高: 214 cm.
潜力: 10
Icon 交易/租借球员: supers & Marko(Clos
-- 55 季 35 天
Uo, labai teisingas sprendimas.
Beprotiškai nesąžiningi mainai ir labai greita adminų reakcija.
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+2
显示隐藏的回复: 7
Wouldn't be better if there was a kind of system that would not permit this kind of exchanges (obviously setting some qualifications for acceptable terms) instead of destroying teams after allegedly unacceptable trades? -- 55 季 37 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+1
It would be very complicated to contruct such system and in addition, it was not the only trade between those teams that was unfair. http://www.bballzone.net/lt/MainuLangas-informacija-797501.htm The admins evaluate not only trades, but PM and IP logs as well, which may have influenced that decision. It seems to be a duplicate team of superflights, that's why Marko was closed. -- 55 季 37 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+1
I see your point. I am not saying it was an unfair decision, just tried to propose an alternative that could make the game less negatively surprising. I myself got punished some years ago for something that I have not understood yet... somebody who never appeared as a game user, allegedly used the same IP with me and I (not s/he, I) lost players and some thousands of money... so I guess, if Supers is accused for what it seems, the punishment is not that harsh.
In any case, the exchange system can take some improvements. I don't see the reason for some of the limits that there exist. And I see many good reasons to add up some new limits... the ones that justify this kind of punishments -- 55 季 37 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+1