Player information
This page contains information about the virtual game's character. Any coincidences with the real people (name, surname or other information) are accidental and unintended.
x1
x1
Herbertas Putinas
- Shape:
- Excellent preparation
- Age:
- 21 y.
- Height:
- 205 cm. (6' 9'' )
- Position:
- SF (SF)
- Strength rate (RT):
- 224
- Predicted peak RT:
- 287
- Potential:
- 4
- First team:
- Inturkey Harley Beavers
Skills
Health
Athletic skill:
Accuracy:
Defence:
Offence:
Contract information
On loan
| Term | 3 S |
| Salary |
Borrower - 5 356 Eu (Quilmes ) Owner - 2 295 Eu (Huragan Waksmund) |
| Opinion | Neutral |
Market information
| Minimum requested salary | 7 560 Eu |
1.1
Player:
+0
1.1
Trade/Lending players:
+0
1.1
Show hidden replies: 7
This trade on paper looks far worse then it actually is.
Gorski – 10pot big, yet, undersized and with terrible health inner (-50%). Due to the way he has been trained, he will need full more ~4 seasons to improve in the needed areas and become usable in WL1 or WL2. In the end, his efficient seasons will last from age 25 to 30, max 31 – those are 6 max, far from what those could have been.
Together with Polish manager Gniewko, we have discussed the terms of this trade all offseason. My original offer involved 8-pot 360 RT peak youngster and Wu, which is the young/tall/perfectly trained center that the user has burrowed from me previously (thus, he knew the skills already):
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Trade/information/1235897
This offer was not accepted, as Gniewko was looking for atleast 2 tall Bigs with BOTH good contracts and perfect skills. Because of that, I involved both Wu (again, perfect in age/height/contract/skills combo for any WL2 or WL3 team, no unnecessary skills keeping salary down) and Geo (tall big, needed skills, with contract below min salary). On top of that, Gniewko was looking for youth potential to stimulate this, and I had to involve either 2 7-pots or 1 8pot (I chose first option). Finally, to meet all the requirements, Polish user added salary filler on his side, which is liability on both sides that will be fired by me ASAP.
All in all, this trade works on both sides – I reduce the amount of players and gain someone that could potentially help me in following seasons, while Gniewko gets both fire-power now to fight for TOP3 in WL, as well as youth guys to use in the future. In my eyes, this is win-win and nothing else. -- 101 S 2 d.
Gorski – 10pot big, yet, undersized and with terrible health inner (-50%). Due to the way he has been trained, he will need full more ~4 seasons to improve in the needed areas and become usable in WL1 or WL2. In the end, his efficient seasons will last from age 25 to 30, max 31 – those are 6 max, far from what those could have been.
Together with Polish manager Gniewko, we have discussed the terms of this trade all offseason. My original offer involved 8-pot 360 RT peak youngster and Wu, which is the young/tall/perfectly trained center that the user has burrowed from me previously (thus, he knew the skills already):
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Trade/information/1235897This offer was not accepted, as Gniewko was looking for atleast 2 tall Bigs with BOTH good contracts and perfect skills. Because of that, I involved both Wu (again, perfect in age/height/contract/skills combo for any WL2 or WL3 team, no unnecessary skills keeping salary down) and Geo (tall big, needed skills, with contract below min salary). On top of that, Gniewko was looking for youth potential to stimulate this, and I had to involve either 2 7-pots or 1 8pot (I chose first option). Finally, to meet all the requirements, Polish user added salary filler on his side, which is liability on both sides that will be fired by me ASAP.
All in all, this trade works on both sides – I reduce the amount of players and gain someone that could potentially help me in following seasons, while Gniewko gets both fire-power now to fight for TOP3 in WL, as well as youth guys to use in the future. In my eyes, this is win-win and nothing else. -- 101 S 2 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+3
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
101 S
3 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams
-- 101 S 3 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams
-- 101 S 3 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Player:
+0
+0
+0
- Shape: Not prepared
- Shape: Almost not prepared
- Shape: Excellent
- Shape: Tired
- Shape: Exhausted
- Not registrable for match
- Franchise player
- Team captain
- School talent
- Player has ended his career
- Club wants to trade this player
- Club doesn't want to trade this player
- Transferring player is currently not allowed
- Player is on loan (contract with another club)
- Is going to end his career in the end of the season
- Good dunker
- Good defender
- Good 3-point shooter
- Good playmaker
- Gold medal
- Silver medal
- Bronze medal
- MVP of the season
- In season's TOP5
- The most perspective in league
- Participant of the All Star day