Press conference

Icon Player: Михей Kasparov (RT: 258)
-- 77 S 17 d.
Club fired a player
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
TheCoach intentionally ruining the best russian centre in the game. Offering high salary and sacking him straight away for a second time, when he doesn't need the player and the player is losing RT instead of playing in the british or lithuanian team that offered the player contract. There were 4 market offers, similar offers by british team Banana and by a lithuanian team which I forgot the name and 2 offers by TheCoach. Kasparov has lost 8 RT since TheCoach started intentionally ruining him. It is good that this guy is showing his true colours but it is bad for the game that such behaviour is allowed and that admins are non-existent. -- 77 S 25 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+9
С ЭТИМ НАДО РАЗОБРАТЬСЯ -- 77 S 25 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
The Wild West -- 77 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
The situation seems like my experience with M. Anilionis. -- 77 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
Ha!, I Signed Anilionis thinking he was a good player....turns out the original owner did not know how to train -- 77 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+9
bloomis hahaha, what has this got to do with the actions of your cult leader? It is better if you read twice or look through the history of the player before writing irrelevant things. TheCoach signed him few days ago and fired him, this is the SECOND time in a few days that he fired him after making an offer for him. So he already knew his skills. Do you understand now? Or he can't do wrong in your eyes :D Kasparov skills before TheCoach started ruining him - 11 jump, 11 toughness, 12 close range shot, 10 rebounds, 10 cs. Kasparov skills after numerous days on the market - 11 jump, 10 toughness, 11 close range shot, 9 rebounds, 9 cs. -- 77 S 27 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
Captain Obvious :D I just checked M. Anilionis' history. He played 10 seasons for you, scoring over 15 ppg in two seasons in world league 2 and over 14 ppg in two seasons also in world league 2. Then player changed teams during limited market, you didn't sack him. Then you offer him contract after 2 seasons and trade him after he played 9 matches in your team. On the other hand, TheCoach first signs Kasparov, then fires him after 3 days without playing a game as he never planned to use him anyway, then he offers a contract to Kasparov for second time in just two weeks time and fires him straight away in the same day that he got him. So Kasparov magically was ready to play in World League 1 after 14 days when he was already losing RT, when TheCoach signed him for a second time, huh? :D So this situation has nothing to do with your situation with M. Anilionis. -- 77 S 27 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Maybe I was responding to Captain obvious' comment which seems directed at me....you should try reading twice or looking through the comment history before writing such irrelevant responses. -- 77 S 27 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
Captain obvious is always drunk he is klivaras -- 77 S 27 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+5
Please , God, bless them souls... -- 77 S 27 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+3
Responding to Captain doesn't change anything because he implies that Coach did nothing wrong and this situation reminds him of another situation with a lithuanian player. Saying that you signed some player thinking he was good who turned out to be bad has nothing to do with the present situation as he already knew his skills from 14 days ago yet signed and fired him again... So your comment is quite irrelevant yes and looks to be in defence of TheCoach. If you guys believe that he planned to use Kasparov in World League 1 with 263 RT and that he forgot his skills 14 days after firing him the first time when he was in his team for 3 days and didn't play a game then feel free to, whatever makes you feel good. :D -- 77 S 29 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
If you pay salary, it is your choice what to do with a player. If you needed him so desperately, why you did not bid 50k, like you did on young Russian in restricted market? -- 77 S 29 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
Clearly your understanding is poor because I neither endorsed or discouraged what Coach did/said...In fact my comment as a whole doesn't even touch upon or talk about you or coach at all, it was strictly in response to something directed at me. Maybe you should focus on more relevant things like getting out of WL4 than being hung up on something that someone did to your former player. -- 77 S 29 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+3
Clearly you don't want to understand that your comment was irrelevant, if you got triggered so much. Situation of Anilionis is irrelevant to the situation of Kasparov, they are nothing alike. So it is completely irrelevant to comment Anilionis here. Captain Obvious included. Don't be hurt that i called your comment what it is, irrelevant. Nothing personal. You continue to write irrelevant comments, this time you drop to a childish level, it must hurt you deep inside that coach left the game in a rage quit. :D The only relevant thing here is that he ruined the best russian C in the game and this way hurt the Russian national team. -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
benislovas, I didn't need him so desperately, that's why i didn't even make an offer for him. The only teams that made offers were British team Banana and one Lithuanian team. Then after he was fired for second time by Coach i planned to make offer for him and could have taken him but Banana already had made an offer for him and its manager really wanted the player as he made an offer the last time he was on the market, so i decided not to make an offer for him and let Banana have him. We need him for the national team, Russian community needs him for its national team. For this he needs a team to play in, he should have started playing in one of those two teams last time instead of losing skills on the market being intentionally ruined. So you agree with actions that hurt the Russian national team, but if it was Chinese managers offering high salaries to Lithuanian players then firing them so that they lose skills on the market you were going to be singing a different tune then. -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Few points here - how do you know that banana bid on him? It is your multi team or what?
If we look in this way, then every fire is a ruin of the player, because player loose skills and it is bad for someone. So you suggest that everyone who buys player from the market and then fires him should be punished? -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+3
Its obvious Coach intentionally ruined the player, its also clear it didnt happen without a reason. Dont see point of discussion. -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
What reason could The Coach have? Why he "ruining" russian player? Twice?! I can't understand. Maybe he want to response us? -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
benislovas there is difference in buying and firing twice in row knowing his skills and that he will not play in his team. -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
The reason was that iskandar bid 50k on a player from thecoach that wasn't nearly worth that much (next highest offer was 20k). This was aggravated by the fact that before iskandar's offer he communicated quite some with thecoach who gave him advice etc. So thecoach felt quite betrayed by the offer, as iskandar also didn't communicate his intent to get this player before (he might have gotten a trade, at a better price, who knows?). What thecoach then did after the offer was target iskandar and his players, not the Russian community, by hiring & firing some players. At any rate, iskandar could have gotten those players too if he bid more. Also, if using extensions you avoid losing your players in free agency. And you should be aware if you unnecessarily raise prices for top league teams, they will be pissed. And they have more money than you. It was important for TheCoach to teach this lesson, especially after getting "backstabbed" after communicating before with iskandar. He paid for it, mind you, spending many Euros on those hirings and firings. He punished himself already by doing it, but thought it worthwhile to teach iskandar a lesson. Anyhow, he stopped playing. So go and stop your flaming wars and rather learn how to play instead of issuing mindless offers before poking the next bear. ; ) -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+5
i dont believe he spent a single euro for this endevour :) you are rich enough up there to do this on games money :)
i liked that " if unnecessarily raise price"... its free to bid as much as you want or not anymore? its not the first time i see " you cannot touch WL1 players" :) peasants always will be peasants and they must know their place right? :) -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
It looks like it started the opposite way - iskandar started thread that coach buys a player not the other way around. -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
Yes, you are able to bid how much you want, but players from WL1 or whichever league, it doesn't matter, are allowed to do the same. So if someone bids on your player and gets him, he can do WHATEVER he wants with him. Even fire him 10 times and get him back. So I would recommend not to bid insanely high price for players, because you could get some bids right back, because as you said banana, it's free to bid as much you want. -- 77 S 30 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+3
:D -- 78 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
RaZeev, what a story i shed a tear while reading it. :D but it is no surprise to me why you wrote all this in defence of your beloved coach as he told me in this one conversation that we ever had that you were part of his circle. Betrayed ? Hahahaha. I didnt even know the guy, we spoke once only having one conversation which he started, i didnt go to him. Also i did tell thecoach that i was going to make a bid for his player, i wrote to him - how much i got to offer to bring Fedoseev back home and his response was "haha". I told him its nothing personal. But this betrayed bit is actually hilarious Lol, you take this way too serious. Why so serious? :D Well, his intentions of targeting my players are irrelevant as he targeted the whole russian community with his actions by ruining Kasparov who most valuable player last two seasons with Russia. Also he wasnt my player anymore the second time he bid and fired him continuing to ruin him. Backstabbed ahhahahha, is that how it works, he starts writing to other managers so they become part of his circle and if you threaten his interests you betray him lol. Also it looks like he overplayed his hands with his "lesson" as he thought he was untouchable but FPC ruled against him if we judge by a post of american manager, which led to his rage quit, so much for his lesson. I was prepared for long war but he quit too soon. :D -- 78 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+5
Nevski, he cant answer you bro, he rage quit the game because of FPC decision. It could be because many russian managers reported him because he ruined Kasparov. His big ego was hurt so much by a FPC decision that he rage quit the game. :D -- 78 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4