Press conference
1.1
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
83 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
83 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
83 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
3.1
Dear FPC members, you may find an interesting phenomenon. It seems that many transactions in world 3.1 have been reported maliciously at the same time. I don’t know if the person who reported has ulterior motives, but whether this behavior also needs to be considered for punishment. What? The malicious practices of some players have made us feel that we have been treated maliciously.
--
83 S
9 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2
Looking at the eff, it looks like that just 1 team getting stronger, cuz those two dosnt look like 3wl players, i just see salary cut.
Its just mine oponion (im not reporting) -- 83 S 9 d.
Its just mine oponion (im not reporting) -- 83 S 9 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
83 S
9 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 10<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 83 S 9 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 10<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 83 S 9 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0