Description du joueur
Cette page contient des informations sur un joueur virtuel du jeu. Toute similitude avec une personne réelle (nom, prénom ou autre) est fortuite et non volontaire.
x1
x1
Stasys Dovidaitis
- Forme:
- Préparation excellente
- Age:
- 22 ans
- Taille:
- 197 cm (6' 6'' )
- Position:
- AR (AR)
- Indice de compétence (RT):
- 219
- Estimation du RT maximum:
- 301
- Potentiel:
- 7
- Première équipe:
- BC Žūsės
Compétences
Santé
Physique:
Adresse:
Défense:
Attaque:
Informations contractuelles
| Durée | 3 S |
| Salaire |
Salaire plein - 9 938 Eu Salaire en équipe Espoir - 9 938 Eu |
| Opinion | Bon |
Informations du Marché
| Salaire minimum demandé | 7 394 Eu |
1.1
Joueur:
+0
Échange/Prêt de joueurs:
+0
1.1
+0
Montrer les réponses masquées: 1
Le joueur évolue dans son nouveau Club suite à un échange
--
101 S
10 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
Le joueur évolue dans son nouveau Club suite à un échange
--
101 S
10 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
4.7
+0
+0
1.1
Montrer les réponses masquées: 6
Dear FPC,
The reason given was a "Suspicion that the trade’s goal is to help one of the teams," with a vote of 10 out of 11 volunteers deeming the trade unfair. While I respect the decision-making process of the volunteers, I believe that the decision to reverse the trade was made without sufficient justification and transparency.
On the surface, this trade appears to be a standard transaction where each team could benefit based on its specific needs and strategies. However, the reversal implies that one of the teams was being unfairly helped, which I find puzzling.
To better understand the decision, I respectfully request a detailed explanation addressing the following points:
1. Please clarify which team was considered to be unfairly benefiting from this trade.
2. What specific facts or analysis led to the conclusion that this trade was intended to unfairly benefit one of the teams? Please provide concrete examples that support this suspicion.
3. Could you clarify the criteria used by the volunteers to assess fairness? What specific aspects of the trade were considered unfair?
4. Was the broader context of each team's needs and strategy considered when making this decision? If so, how was this context factored into the final judgment?
As a committed player, I believe in fair play and transparency. A detailed explanation would help me better understand the reasoning behind the decision and ensure that any future trades I make align with the community's standards and expectations. -- 100 S 35 j.
The reason given was a "Suspicion that the trade’s goal is to help one of the teams," with a vote of 10 out of 11 volunteers deeming the trade unfair. While I respect the decision-making process of the volunteers, I believe that the decision to reverse the trade was made without sufficient justification and transparency.
On the surface, this trade appears to be a standard transaction where each team could benefit based on its specific needs and strategies. However, the reversal implies that one of the teams was being unfairly helped, which I find puzzling.
To better understand the decision, I respectfully request a detailed explanation addressing the following points:
1. Please clarify which team was considered to be unfairly benefiting from this trade.
2. What specific facts or analysis led to the conclusion that this trade was intended to unfairly benefit one of the teams? Please provide concrete examples that support this suspicion.
3. Could you clarify the criteria used by the volunteers to assess fairness? What specific aspects of the trade were considered unfair?
4. Was the broader context of each team's needs and strategy considered when making this decision? If so, how was this context factored into the final judgment?
As a committed player, I believe in fair play and transparency. A detailed explanation would help me better understand the reasoning behind the decision and ensure that any future trades I make align with the community's standards and expectations. -- 100 S 35 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
As each FPC member votes on their own behalf, there is usually no public explanation from FPC members. There is no "single voice" here.
One of the reasons we want to have FPC members from different countries is so you can ask them directly.
So, if you have any questions or doubts, my advice would be to contact one or a few FPC members and ask the questions you have. -- 100 S 45 j.
One of the reasons we want to have FPC members from different countries is so you can ask them directly.
So, if you have any questions or doubts, my advice would be to contact one or a few FPC members and ask the questions you have. -- 100 S 45 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
- Forme : Pas préparé
- Forme : Presque pas préparé
- Forme : Excellent
- Forme : Fatigué
- Forme : Épuisé
- Non sélectionnable pour le match
- Joueur personnalisé
- Capitaine de l'équipe
- Talent d'école
- Le joueur a mis fin à sa carrière
- Le club souhaite échanger ce joueur
- Le club ne souhaite pas échanger ce joueur
- Le transfert du joueur n'est actuellement pas autorisé
- En prêt (sous contrat dans un autre club)
- Va mettre fin à sa carrière à la fin de la saison
- Bon dunkeur
- Bon défenseur
- Bon shooteur à 3 points
- Bon meneur de jeu
- Médaille d'or
- Médaille d'argent
- Médaille de bronze
- MVP de la saison
- TOP5 de la saison
- Meilleur Espoir de la ligue
- Participant au All Star Day