球員資訊

This page contains information about the virtual game's character. Any coincidences with the real people (name, surname or other information) are accidental and unintended.
x4
x1
x1
x3
x1
x1
Dong-Tai Siao
球員沒有球會

- 狀態:
- 毫無準備
- 年齡:
- 31 歲
- 身高:
- 214 cm. (7' 0'' )
- 位置:
- C
- 能力值 (RT):
- 279
- 第一支球隊:
- BlackCatSerenade
技能
健康
運動技能:
投籃:
防守:
進攻:
市場資訊
其他球隊報價期限 | 27 天 10:00 |
報價 | 0 |
最低薪資要求 | 17 050 Eu |

+0
顯示已隱藏回覆: 6


How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 賽季 25 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 賽季 25 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0

Salary drop. Trade is not useful. Such potential youth will never play in wl1
--
103 賽季
3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+2

With all due respect, who are You to judge whether or not these youngsters will ever be eligable for WL1 level? Do You know information about their skills or inners?:)
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 賽季 3 天
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 賽季 3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+8

+0

+0

+0

+0