Spēlētāja informācija
Šī lapa satur informāciju par virtulālās spēles tēlu. Jebkuras sakritības ar reāliem cilvēkiem (vārds, uzvārds vai cita informācija) ir nejauša un neparedzēta.
x1
x1
x3
x1
Oliver Chojnacki
- Forma:
- Lieliska sagatavotība
- Vecums:
- 25 g.
- Garums:
- 204 cm. (6' 8'' )
- Pozīcija:
- SF (SG)
- Stipruma likme (RT):
- 277
- Prognozētais augstākais RT:
- 317
- Potenciāls:
- 6
- Pirmā komanda:
- IŠEINU ATOSTOGŲ
Prasmes
Veselība
Atlētiskums:
Precizitāte:
Aizsardzība:
Uzbrukums:
Līguma informācija
| Termiņš | 4 S |
| Alga | 11 326 Eu |
| Viedoklis | Neitrāli |
Tirgus informācija
| Minimālā pieprasītā alga | 16 161 Eu |
1.1
Maiņa/Aizdotie spēlētāji:
+0
2.1
Spēlētājs:
+0
1.1
+0
Parādīt paslēptās ziņas: 6
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 S 25 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 S 25 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
1.1
Salary drop. Trade is not useful. Such potential youth will never play in wl1
--
103 S
3 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+2
With all due respect, who are You to judge whether or not these youngsters will ever be eligable for WL1 level? Do You know information about their skills or inners?:)
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 S 3 d.
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 S 3 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+8
1.1
+0
Spēlētājs:
+0
- Shape: Not prepared
- Shape: Almost not prepared
- Shape: Excellent
- Shape: Tired
- Shape: Exhausted
- Not registrable for match
- Franchise player
- Team captain
- School talent
- Player has ended his career
- Club wants to trade this player
- Club doesn't want to trade this player
- Transferring player is currently not allowed
- Player is on loan (contract with another club)
- Is going to end his career in the end of the season
- Good dunker
- Good defender
- Good 3-point shooter
- Good playmaker
- Gold medal
- Silver medal
- Bronze medal
- MVP of the season
- In season's TOP5
- The most perspective in league
- Participant of the All Star day