Informação de jogador
Esta página contém informações sobre o personagem do jogo virtual. Quaisquer coincidências com pessoas reais (nome, sobrenome ou outras informações) são acidentais e não intencionais.
x5
x6
x6
x8
x6
x1
x2
x1
x1
x1
Ivo Eterovic
Escolherá o clube na próxima temporada
- Forma:
- Despreparado
- Idade:
- 31 a.
- Altura:
- 191 cm (6' 3'' )
- Posição:
- AP
- Habilidades Totais (HT):
- 193
- Primeiro time:
- ZAGORKA BEDEX
Habilidades
Saúde
Habilidade atlética:
Arremesso:
Defesa:
Ataque:
Informação de Mercado
Escolherá o clube na próxima temporada
| Salário mínimo solicitado | 5 386 Eu |
1.1
Jogador:
+0
4.7
Troca/Emprestando jogadores:
+0
Mostrar respostas ocultas: 6
Dear FPC,
The reason given was a "Suspicion that the trade’s goal is to help one of the teams," with a vote of 10 out of 11 volunteers deeming the trade unfair. While I respect the decision-making process of the volunteers, I believe that the decision to reverse the trade was made without sufficient justification and transparency.
On the surface, this trade appears to be a standard transaction where each team could benefit based on its specific needs and strategies. However, the reversal implies that one of the teams was being unfairly helped, which I find puzzling.
To better understand the decision, I respectfully request a detailed explanation addressing the following points:
1. Please clarify which team was considered to be unfairly benefiting from this trade.
2. What specific facts or analysis led to the conclusion that this trade was intended to unfairly benefit one of the teams? Please provide concrete examples that support this suspicion.
3. Could you clarify the criteria used by the volunteers to assess fairness? What specific aspects of the trade were considered unfair?
4. Was the broader context of each team's needs and strategy considered when making this decision? If so, how was this context factored into the final judgment?
As a committed player, I believe in fair play and transparency. A detailed explanation would help me better understand the reasoning behind the decision and ensure that any future trades I make align with the community's standards and expectations. -- 100 T 35 d.
The reason given was a "Suspicion that the trade’s goal is to help one of the teams," with a vote of 10 out of 11 volunteers deeming the trade unfair. While I respect the decision-making process of the volunteers, I believe that the decision to reverse the trade was made without sufficient justification and transparency.
On the surface, this trade appears to be a standard transaction where each team could benefit based on its specific needs and strategies. However, the reversal implies that one of the teams was being unfairly helped, which I find puzzling.
To better understand the decision, I respectfully request a detailed explanation addressing the following points:
1. Please clarify which team was considered to be unfairly benefiting from this trade.
2. What specific facts or analysis led to the conclusion that this trade was intended to unfairly benefit one of the teams? Please provide concrete examples that support this suspicion.
3. Could you clarify the criteria used by the volunteers to assess fairness? What specific aspects of the trade were considered unfair?
4. Was the broader context of each team's needs and strategy considered when making this decision? If so, how was this context factored into the final judgment?
As a committed player, I believe in fair play and transparency. A detailed explanation would help me better understand the reasoning behind the decision and ensure that any future trades I make align with the community's standards and expectations. -- 100 T 35 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0
As each FPC member votes on their own behalf, there is usually no public explanation from FPC members. There is no "single voice" here.
One of the reasons we want to have FPC members from different countries is so you can ask them directly.
So, if you have any questions or doubts, my advice would be to contact one or a few FPC members and ask the questions you have. -- 100 T 45 d.
One of the reasons we want to have FPC members from different countries is so you can ask them directly.
So, if you have any questions or doubts, my advice would be to contact one or a few FPC members and ask the questions you have. -- 100 T 45 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0
Jogador:
+0
+0
+0
- Forma: Não preparado
- Forma: Quase preparado
- Forma: Excelente
- Forma: Cansado
- Forma: Exausto
- Indisponível para a partida
- Jogador da franquia
- Capitão do time
- Talento da base
- Jogador se aposentou
- Clube quer trocar este jogador
- Clube não quer trocar este jogador
- Não é permitido trocar este jogador no momento
- Jogador está emprestado (contrato com outro clube)
- Irá se aposentar no fim desta temporada
- Bom dunker
- Bom defensor
- Bom arremessador de 3 PTs
- Bom criador de jogadas
- Medalha de ouro
- Medalha de prata
- Medalha de bronze
- MVP da temporada
- No TOP5 da temporada
- Com mais potencial da liga
- Participante do dia do All-Star