Информация об обмене
Принят
| Информация | |
|---|---|
| Начало переговоров | 2024-12-18- 15:20 |
| Окончание переговоров | 2024-12-18- 15:28 |
| Уровень ограничений | |
|
Oliver Chojnacki
|
|||
| Оклад: | 14333 Eu | |||
| Контракт: | 1 сез. | Возраст: | 23 г. | |
| КС: | 247 | Рост: | 204 см | |
| Потенциал: | 6 | |||
|
Henryk Witebski
|
|||
| Оклад: | - | |||
| Контракт: | Шк. талант | Возраст: | 15 г. | |
| КС: | 53 | Рост: | 190 см | |
| Потенциал: | 7 | |||
|
Hā Leng
|
|||
| Оклад: | 26330 Eu | |||
| Контракт: | 1 сез. | Возраст: | 30 г. | |
| КС: | 337 | Рост: | 201 см | |
| Потенциал: | 3 | |||
|
Dong-Tai Siao
|
|||
| Оклад: | 20743 Eu | |||
| Контракт: | 2 сез. | Возраст: | 29 г. | |
| КС: | 315 | Рост: | 214 см | |
| Потенциал: | 3 | |||
Обмен (Сделка)/Одолжение игроков:
+0
1.1
Показать скрытые ответы: 6
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 сез. 25 д.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 сез. 25 д.
--
(Переводить)
(Переводить EN)
+0
1.1
Salary drop. Trade is not useful. Such potential youth will never play in wl1
--
103 сез.
3 д.
--
(Переводить)
(Переводить EN)
+2
With all due respect, who are You to judge whether or not these youngsters will ever be eligable for WL1 level? Do You know information about their skills or inners?:)
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 сез. 3 д.
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 сез. 3 д.
--
(Переводить)
(Переводить EN)
+8
