New rule about deliberately lost matches and accomplished challenge!

2018-06-02

Not long ago we challenged federations (http://www.bballzone.net/en/News-read-5af8beeaa1cdf_Awards_for_federations_and_users__New_challenges_.htm)
We are very glad that one of the challenges is already accomplished! Lithuanian federation translated the newspaper about 63rd season into English language. You can find it here: http://www.bballzone.net/newspaper/Ball_63_EN.pdf
Therefore, all federation’s members received a discount to analyzing players (coaches).

We would like to have a newspaper about the game every season. Maybe one of the federations would like to undertake it and prepare a newspaper for the end of this season?

Game’s rules have been supplemented by a new rule (http://www.bballzone.net/lt/Pagalba-sarasas.htm#hlpanc_2070)
“1.10. The only allowed types of help for other users are: transferring credits and consulting. All other actions and interaction between teams must obviously represent aim to get use for your own team. It is forbidden to lose matches deliberately, make ineffective trades or help another team in any other ways.”

So, if you notice that this rule is obviously violated, please inform about it here: Private messages -> Message to administration -> Suspicions of cheating.
This rule comes into effect starting: 64 season, 27 day

We also invite everyone to discuss how such violations could be supervised by the game’s community without intervention from the administration:
http://www.bballzone.net/forum/fair-play-team-trades-volunteers-t13485.html

Anasayfaya dön

4.4 5.3 a-ramune

Oyun haberleri: New rule about deliberately lost matches and accomplished challenge!

-- 64 S 27 g.

Lihuanian federation accomplished its challenge!
Also, new rule added.
Read more in news.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

What happen if sometimes users take risk for give more minute to younger players looking for better training? What make you sure someone deliberately wanna lose a game? Which criterio? -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

2.1 4.4 Frankebasta

Is it allowed to experiment new tactics? What if i lose a winnable game because i played "fast break often"?
We cannot make ineffective trade, I know.
But am I not helping a team by lending players as well?
If I receive multiple requests to borrow, by choosing one of the teams I'm showing favoritism, isn't it collusion as well? -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

3.4 4.6 a-darius

In some cases it is very obvious that team does not try to win. For example:

http://www.bballzone.net/lt/Rungtynes-aprasymas-11165126.htm

We will need discuss, what to do with not such obvious cases:

http://www.bballzone.net/forum/fair-play-team-trades-volunteers-t13485.html -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

3.4 4.6 a-darius

Frankebasta:
Sometimes teams have players just to lend for friends in lower divisions. But this is quite a rare thing and I do not expect that we will see many such cases. -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

2.1 4.4 Frankebasta

Why should he have done that on purpose? What did he gain? Should we care for his motives?

Everybody here punts games, usually to reach game3 of a playoff series.

I may also choose to play my backups against a superior team on the road in order to protect them from injuries (like San Antonio and other teams do in real life).

Or to hide my game strategy in the road game, and try for an upset win at my home in the return match.

If I want to play 5 players for 40 minutes, to earn more training and experience, and I will use loose defense and Passive Offense (a-darius told me to do so, in order to avoid Foul-outs), what's wrong with that? -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

4.6 3.4 darys

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Captain Obvious, tai nepatiks :D -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

2.2 2.2 jupiter112

If I don't need to win this game,I want trained young player,i will loss ,but i don't help another -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

7.6 8.127 superdzonis

For games that are lost intentionally, the best penalty would be a technical loss to the team which won (the weaker one) and financial penalty for the stronger team (increase 5-10 fold every time if repeated). The most obvious cases are when teams with very few losses get crushed at home by a team which is competing for 3-4th places in the group. In quite many of such scenarios, only bench players play, positions might be mixed up (C playing as starting PG) or many players are set to loose defence etc. So such cases are quite easily identified, while for others I think we should wait and see. -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

游戏就是游戏，它需要娱乐性，太多无谓规则，让它变得无聊。 -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

nesta522

Nice improvement, I think it helps to maintain the fairness of the game -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

3.3 3.4 vialis

Both teams should get technical loses. And fans should be unhappy about that so they should lose some fans and some popularity points -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

2.1 3.2 fourkings

I will remain cautiously optimistic about this new rule. However, I prefer to see the rules of execution without distinction, rather than selective enforcement. This problem is always in the game. When you want to raise objections and refute my statement, please feel your conscience. -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

卡爷

Technical loss, that’s the NBA thing, and BBZ is similar to NBA, isn’t it? Some times we need to lose the game for avoiding against the team which is better than us in the first round in the playoffs. -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

1.1 2.2 HeyHoudini

In NBA you lose to get better chances in draft lotery for higher pick :) and you try to win more to have home court advantage in playoffs :) so your NBA comparisson for losing is not relevant :) as here teams lose so team from same country could advance into top16 or playoffs :)) -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

RaZeev

I would like to see the most obvious attempts to help another team (from one's country) to advance into the next round. The rest may be too tough to judge. -- 64 S 27 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

卡爷

Is that situation always happen? -- 64 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

Gizli cevapları göster: 17

bastoschak

I am confused about the two responses above as they are word by word the same response... :/ -- 64 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

Sajanas300

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

Man, I am even more confused with the comment above now. Lol -- 64 S 38 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

New rule about deliberately lost matches and accomplished challenge!

Hızlı rehber

Bu mesajı bildir