俱樂部資訊

核心球員 Baltramiejus Busikas

93 RT

年齡: 16 歲

身高: 204 公分

For Fun

國內名稱: Ant bajerio

3.4

4.6

經理: a-darius

G. Kavoliūnas

得分: 19,1

A. Naß

籃板: 4,7

D. Perlys

助攻: 3,8

資訊

最近上線	2024-11-23 01:31
國家	Lithuania
聯盟	Lithuanian Basketball Federation
俱樂部簡稱	ForFun (Fun)
籃球學校	ForFun 籃球學校
青年隊	For Fun

排名

遊戲排名	234 (排名)
國內聯賽排名	3 (排名)
國際聯賽排名	1 (排名)
平均RT	276
球迷俱樂部	677
球迷排名	263 (排名)
國際聯賽人氣排名	5 (排名)
形象	5/7
員工意見	7/7

統計數據

每週贊助收入	63039 Eu
人員薪資上限	246636 Eu
交易限制等級	7 (歷史)
完成交易	1
本季交易	0
全部勝場/比賽	613/1096 56%
賽季勝場/比賽	28/51 55%
租借球員數量	14

Lietuva.3.4	10 名次
World League.4.6	17 名次

3.4 4.6 a-darius

-- 101 賽季 61 天

I want to share another situation with you.
This time, it really surprised me because it seems that even teams at the TOP level of the game don't understand this tactical setting.

I’m sure there are other users who may benefit from this, so I’ll explain it publicly.

In the upcoming match, we have a tactical setting:
"Minimum Required Points Difference"
Please note that this tactical setting is only accessible from the Schedule page for future matches. You cannot include this in your default tactic.
This is because it is meant to be used only in very specific situations. Sometimes, to advance to the next level (e.g., TOP16), you need not only to win but to win by a specific point difference. Let’s say at least 4 points. In such cases, you can use this setting, and the team will aim to win by the required point difference.

For example, if the team is winning by only 3 points, it will perform tactical fouls and do everything possible to secure a 4-point win. Essentially, the team will act as if it’s losing by one point rather than winning by three. However, this also means that instead of winning by 3 points, you could end up losing the game entirely.

Do not use this setting in everyday situations. Use it only when your team absolutely needs to win by a specific point margin!

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.4 4.6 a-darius

https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Pagalba-sarasas.htm#hlpanc_56d75a95926b3
From manual:

Minimum required points difference
Usually teams fight for victory and make various tactical decisions in order to achieve it. Sometimes team needs not just victory but some particular points difference.
According to this tactical setting in the end of the match team will make such tactical decisions that would allow to achieve the indicated points difference.
Note: This setting can be indicated only in tactics of individual match. -- 101 賽季 61 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.4 4.6 a-darius

-- 101 賽季 59 天

In the past few days, during the evenings, I have been analyzing users' messages written in "Message to Administration" regarding match endings.

We do have some issues here; however, most messages are related to tactics, not the match engine. I have already found a few very similar situations, so I decided to respond publicly, as this can help users understand what happens.

I received complaints from users about players (who cannot shoot three-pointers) attempting to shoot from outside at the end of games. The reason is that sometimes there are simply no other players on the court who can shoot three-pointers. If the team needs 3 points, it will still choose the best available option and pass the ball to that player to shoot from outside.

Sometimes users even deliberately put better shooters on the bench during the final minutes (through tactical combinations of position and player role settings). If you are experiencing this issue, please check if there is at least one good three-point shooter on the court during the final minutes of matches.

-----
Additionally, I want to remind you that if you think something is not working correctly, please write a detailed explanation in "Message to Administration." Don’t forget to include links.

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.4 5.3 a-ramune

遊戲新聞: 年老教練的技能將從102季起開始下降

-- 101 賽季 31 天

Old coaches' skills will start decreasing from season 102. Find more in News!

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 2.1 smart0eddie

So if a coach has a skill 12 with average potential
What is the minimum?
3 or 9 -- 101 賽季 31 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 4.6 barbabodom

Because it´s already easy to find good coaches... smh -- 101 賽季 31 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.4 5.3 a-ramune

smart0eddie,
The minimum is always 3 with average skill's potential -- 101 賽季 32 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 Cesarrr

In worse scenario -9/day means -567/season... Wow -- 101 賽季 32 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 Cesarrr

Is It gonna make tactical coaches even more expensive? We have 100k/week coaches now. You should change max bid to 200k/week... -- 101 賽季 32 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 2.2 phatman

Do You really believe any changes in the plan is possible? :) -- 101 賽季 32 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 HeyHoudini

As usually, well-handled update. Can't get mad anymore. -- 101 賽季 32 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.1 4.4 Formatas

Nebuvo jokių problemų su treneriais. Priėjo Darius, pasakė, nuo šiol bus! -- 101 賽季 32 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.3 d0man

I think tactival coches will be ok. Training coaches will be a problem because they won't have improvement jumps.
And the update is handled ok it was announced 3-4 seasons ago and yet people are here surprised. The update's content is a different matter but we need to wait and see how it will look in practice. -- 101 賽季 32 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 2.1 smart0eddie

You may easily train a few training coaches with a single 12 -- 101 賽季 34 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.3 d0man

It take at least 6 seasons to train coach to that level unless he is changed player or have very high potential and with potential salary let's say 5k for coach and you cannot trade them to train one season this next this so you need have 4 coaches around 12 in single skill and around 3-5k in salary so 15k, oh and you have youth team so you need 4 next coaches with 12. Oh there aren't many on market like that so now it isn t 3-5k it is 5-10k. So you need to sacrifice type of training or just don't train players. -- 101 賽季 34 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.3 6.4 GRAFAS

and... you think this is normal? :) -- 101 賽季 34 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 6.23 TheWizardKs

So at 60 years old, a coach with say a 12 in athletics will be 9 maximum after 1 year? That is ridiculous if so. In the USA you don't retire from any job until over 65 at a minimum. It should have a smooth curve where training slows down over time and then starts decreasing slowly, with the rate of decline going up every year. -- 101 賽季 34 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Y 6 Kogzik

Is it still a basketball manager or basketball survival? -- 101 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+13

2.1 3.2 rurutis

Survival of the fittest :D -- 101 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 3.2 rurutis

No country for old men -- 101 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 4.7 Kogzik

And by the way, if we're talking about changes that would add some value to the game, maybe you could do something to make the mid range useful in this game. -- 101 賽季 38 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.6 3.3 fortuzas

Making salary ceiling for franchise players would aslo help. -- 101 賽季 38 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 1.1 superdzonis

fix early extentions also would help :D -- 101 賽季 38 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 3.2 rurutis

superdzonis ain't nothing wrong with them -- 101 賽季 38 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 1.1 superdzonis

you know better -- 101 賽季 38 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.2 Smoku

i have a feeling, that every change excludes some part of players/coaches from the game. short players are excludes, beacause they are mostly useless. old players same. now old coaches. there are lots of players on the market nobody bids on. you should imho try to include players/coaches to the game. give a reason for us to fit them to our teams, not otherways. the economy should be better, because now people bids for small percentage of players and they wages rise. when more players will be usefull, prices will go down. please work on that.
I didn't like this change from beginning, because it gives nothing. it is irrelevant. go for other changes, like better 2m efficiency, usuefull dribbling skill, some advantages to short players. something, what has influence to daily game rather, than to many season calculating.
people are leaving game because they cannot handle economy or ME is unpredictable. no new player will enjoy old coach's skill reduction over the season. -- 101 賽季 41 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 3.2 rurutis

That's what you get for not promoting your retired players to coaches for credits -- 101 賽季 41 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 2.1 andriuss

Nu as suprantu kad zaidejai senstant letaja igudziai krenta.bet nuo kada treneriams igudziai krenta?ar darius gali ta logiskai paaiskint? -- 101 賽季 41 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.1 zurda10

They get dementia like Pesic lmao -- 101 賽季 41 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.1 ulipulido

I don't understand why the problem of the national leagues is not solved. In leagues where there are powerful teams, nobody wants to play in the first division.

In Spain we already have 5 teams in WL1 plus many in WL2 trying to promote, so the most you can fight for is to be 8.

Right now you earn between 3-4k more per game than in the second division, for an average of 9 games, let's say 27-36k more at the box office. By entering the top 8 in second, you are already earning more than that, between 20-30k more if you are first or second.

To this we must add that first of all you are going to lose image and fans due to defeats.

In short, playing in NL1, if you do not enter the playoff, means:

-20-30k per season
-Loss of fans
-Image loss

With that we find playoff results 20-27, with both teams trying NOT to WIN with all their might.

It's absurd, there is no sport where the worst team in the first division does not DOUBLE IN INCOME the best in the second division. And here I'm not saying that income will double, but at least it won't be DISASTROUS to play in the best category in your country, it's totally absurd.

I think there may be easy solutions, or am I missing something:

-Give prizes at the end of the season to the 12 teams (at least to compensate for the economy)
-Increase the box office in leagues where you play against high RT teams. It's absurd to have 2000 interest playing against a WL1 playoff team

This seems more important to me than other topics such as design or coaches, which worries practically all managers who are not in WL1, and which goes against the competitiveness of the game. -- 101 賽季 45 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+11

3.4 4.6 a-darius

We have discussed this topic multiple times and reviewed various ideas on how to address it.
The last time, I believe, was in the previous season’s press conferences, where I explained why we are not working in this area:

https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Press/21147754/read

It's good that you keep highlighting problematic areas, as sometimes we may genuinely forget certain issues.
However, with this particular issue, we are well aware of the problem.
We have explored all possible solutions but couldn’t find a quick, effective fix.
For a larger and more complex solution, we simply don’t have the resources.
Currently, we are already behind on multiple tasks, facing other issues, and do not plan to make changes to national leagues anytime soon — at least not with our current finances. -- 101 賽季 45 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.1 ulipulido

hello Darius, first of all, thanks for the answer, I don't know if I'm missing something, but with a few small changes many of the problems of the national leagues would be equalized:
Experience, the same "X" per national league game regardless of the rival. This way the bot leagues and few users do not lose experience -Box office depending on the rival (top leagues, high box office) -Similar final prizes in all of them (so if you have bots you win less at the box office), not the same, but not with huge differences like now. -Prizes for the 12, being superior to the lower division, this way you encourage promotion, so that being in a higher league does not mean losing money, and in leagues with few users you do not win as much in the games and they have final prizes I don't know, maybe I'm missing something, but these are the main problems I see. -- 101 賽季 45 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.4 4.6 a-darius

Unfortunately, that would fix one problem but create another. I believe I responded to similar suggestions in previous discussions.

Additionally, updates regarding finances are always risky and time-consuming. A lot of calculation and testing is needed; otherwise, we risk increasing inflation. -- 101 賽季 45 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 ak904

a-darius
The issue with the national league have existed for a long time, and almost every season, someone brings it up for discussion. I think you should seriously face this problem and prioritize resolving it, instead of allowing it to persist. I believe that compared to developing new features, everyone would much rather see the issue with the national league thoroughly resolved. -- 101 賽季 51 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 Cesarrr

a-darius listen to the community please. Just it :) -- 101 賽季 51 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.6 3.4 darys

Darius does not work for nothing. Any upgrade must bring Darius a profit. If you want an update with the National League, then throw money at the programmer's 6-month salary, who might be able to do something. -- 101 賽季 51 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.1 4.4 Formatas

Kas sumokėjo už trenerių senėjimo įvedimą? :) -- 101 賽季 52 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.6 3.4 darys

Treneriai visą laiką senėjo, senėja ir senės. Čia nieko nereikėjo įvedinėti :D -- 101 賽季 52 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.6 3.4 darys

O jeigu kalbi apie paskutinius trenerių atnaujinimus, tai chebra susimetė -

https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Premium/investment-description/9

https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Premium/invest-into-game -- 101 賽季 52 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.2 3.3 Sidiav

Jo susimetėm, bet eilinį kart buvom apgauti, nes aprašyme nebuvo nė žodžiu paminėta, kad norima padaryti, kad treneriam radikaliai skillai žemyn važiuot pradėtu -- 101 賽季 52 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.6 3.4 darys

O kas sakė, kad mažės radikaliai? Dar atnaujinimas neprasidėjo, o jau tiek nepasitenkinimo :D -- 101 賽季 52 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

顯示隱藏回應: 37

1.1 1.1 Zolininkas

Tai jei kris kaip zaidejams, tai maniskiui treneriui jau pirma savaite du skilai kris is 12 i 11 :D -- 101 賽季 52 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.6 3.4 darys

Tai jeigu prie pat ribos yra tai normalu, kad kris. Kur čia problema? Dabar už tai daug greičiau auga tie treneriai, tai nebebus problemų naują užsiauginti. -- 101 賽季 52 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 1.1 superdzonis

Nu jo vietoj 40sezonu 20 tereiks tai nebera problemu -- 101 賽季 52 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.4 4.6 ForFun

球員: Anatol Naß (RT: 291)

-- 101 賽季 43 天

球員接受俱樂部提供的合約

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

World League.1.1	x 1
Lietuva.1.1	x 3
National U18	14 名次 Taiwan U18
National U21-3	10 名次 Georgia U21
National Men-3	9 名次 Georgia Men

俱樂部資訊

For Fun

國內名稱: Ant bajerio

資訊

排名

統計數據

重大成就

101 賽季

100 賽季

俱樂部資訊

For Fun

國內名稱: Ant bajerio

資訊

排名

統計數據

重大成就

101 賽季

100 賽季

快速指南

檢舉這則貼文